Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono Black Demons | trevor dalrymple | 10-5 | None |
| Mono Black Demons | yosuke shimizu | 8-4 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Midrange , Esper Control , Esper Pixie , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Midrange , Mono Black Demons , Mono Black Vampires
Meta Performance Analysis
Moment of Craving ranks #1785 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 35%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Moment of Craving is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 6.52 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Moment of Craving has a win rate of 60.8%, making it 28.0% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duress | Sorcery | 12 | 27.2% | 1 |
| Vraska's Contempt | Instant | 9 | 21.6% | 1 |
| Thought Erasure | Sorcery | 7 | 19.6% | 0 |
| Search for Azcanta | Legendary Enchantment | 6 | 18.8% | 0 |
| The Eldest Reborn | Enchantment — Saga | 5 | 16.1% | 0 |
| Cast Down | Instant | 6 | 14.6% | 0 |
| Negate | Instant | 6 | 12.5% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Moment of Craving than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 12 | 55.4% | 58.4% | -3.0% |
| Cry of the Carnarium | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 51.9% | 57.1% | -5.3% |
| Vraska's Contempt | Instant | 4 | 9 | 52.5% | 57.9% | -5.4% |
| Cast Down | Instant | 2 | 7 | 51.9% | 57.6% | -5.8% |
| The Eldest Reborn | Enchantment — Saga | 5 | 5 | 54.3% | 60.9% | -6.6% |
| Thought Erasure | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 47.4% | 56.0% | -8.6% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 6 | 42.9% | 58.7% | -15.8% |
| Hostage Taker | Creature — Human Pirate | 4 | 5 | 42.9% | 62.5% | -19.6% |
| Thief of Sanity | Creature — Specter | 3 | 5 | 33.3% | 57.5% | -24.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 12 | 0.5% | 23.9% |
| Esper Pixie | 6 | 0.3% | 31.6% |
| Mono Black Demons | 4 | 2.1% | 57.1% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 2 | 0.8% | 83.3% |
| Golgari Midrange | 2 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.